MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122068730 · doi:10.1109/ecce.2011.6064191

Common-mode voltage reduction methods for medium-voltage current source inverter-fed drives

2011· article· en· W2122068730 on OpenAlexaff
Ning Zhu, Bin Wu, Deiwei Xu, Navid R. Zargari, Mehrdad Kazerani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooRockwell Automation (Canada)Toronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModulation indexCommon-mode signalWaveformInverterVoltage reductionControl theory (sociology)Modulation (music)VoltageReduction (mathematics)Pulse-width modulationComputer scienceMaterials scienceElectronic engineeringPhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringMathematicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Common-mode voltages (CMVs) can lead to premature failure of the motor insulation system in medium-voltage (MV) current source inverter (CSI)-fed drives. A series of nonzero-state modulation (NZSM) techniques are proposed for the CMV reduction. In these methods, the zero states are avoided because they generate the CMV peak values in common operating conditions of a CSI drive. The overall performance of the proposed modulation techniques with the corresponding switching patterns is investigated. The simulation results indicate that the CMV magnitude is decreased by half using NZSM. Although there are tradeoffs between the CMV reduction and increase in the device switching frequency, shrink in the modulation index range and deterioration in the waveform quality, an active-zero-state modulation (AZSM2) method is recommended for low-speed CSI-fed motor drives with the best CMV reduction effect. The near-state modulation (NSM-S1) technique can be applied to a CSI working at a modulation index higher than 0.67.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionFrench-language works237,207