MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122076209 · doi:10.1149/1.3123769

Milestones in a Quarter Century of CMP - Plenary

2009· article· en· W2122076209 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael A. Fury

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Surface Polishing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIBMChemical-mechanical planarizationQuarter (Canadian coin)Semiconductor industryMoore's lawEngineeringManufacturing engineeringManagementBusinessOperations managementElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringEconomicsHistoryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A quarter century has passed since the first semiconductor planarization experiments were conducted in the silicon wafer manufacturing facility in 1983 at IBM in East Fishkill, NY. This paper will review selected highlights of the technology and business drivers that shaped what has become a pervasive, critically enabling process sector in the pursuit of Moore's Law. Since 1988 the segment has grown from zero to $1.2B in capital equipment and $2.0B in consumable materials and ancillaries annually. The fundamental CMP process consisting of a polisher, slurry and pad has spawned a supply chain of no fewer than 18 uniquely identifiable CMP-related product lines and countless businesses. CMP has indeed matured, with an overall growth rate that matches but no longer exceeds that of the industry to which it has become so vital. The paper will conclude with an outlook for the near-term growth opportunities for CMP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicAdvanced Surface Polishing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207