Clinically Relevant Expansion of Hematopoietic Stem Cells with Conserved Function in a Single-Use, Closed-System Bioprocess
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The clinical potential of umbilical cord blood-derived stem and progenitor cells has been demonstrated in various animal and human transplantation studies. However, the need for increased numbers of appropriate umbilical cord blood-derived cells continues to limit the development and success of these therapies. Ex vivo expansion has been widely studied as a method to overcome this limitation. We describe the use of a clinically relevant single-use, closed-system bioprocess capable of generating greater numbers of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells that maintain in vivo and in vitro developmental potential. In addition to expanded numbers of CD34+ cells, CD34(+)CD38(-) cells, colony-forming cells, and long-term culture-initiating cells, the bioprocess generated > or =3.3-fold more long-term nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient repopulating cells (quantitatively determined using limiting dilution analysis) than present at input. Interestingly, these cells were also capable of multilineage engraftment and were shown to maintain their engraftment potency on a per long-term nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient repopulating cell basis compared with input noncultured cells. The developmental capacity of bioprocess-generated cells was further demonstrated by their ability to repopulate secondary nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient recipients. In vitro lineage analysis confirmed that bioprocess-generated cells could differentiate into myeloid and natural killer, B, and T cell lymphoid lineages. This in-depth analysis describes a bioprocess that generates human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with conserved hematopoietic activity, establishes analysis criteria for in vitro hematopoietic stem cell expansion studies, and serves as a foundation to test the therapeutic utility of cultured hematopoietic stem cells in large animals and humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".