Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome with or without intrauterine insemination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of intrauterine insemination (IUI) in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) among couples with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and normal semen analysis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University teaching center. PATIENTS: PCOS couples with normal semen analysis that underwent COH with IUI or timed intercourse (TIC). INTERVENTION: COH with clomiphene citrate, letrozole or gonadotropins with or without IUI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical pregnancy rates. RESULTS: Of a total 265 cycles, 151 cycles were with IUI and 114 others with TIC. No significant difference was found in the overall pregnancy rates between the TIC group (17.5%) and the IUI group (16.6%). Analysis of pregnancy rates according to the type of COH treatments did not demonstrate the advantages of IUI over TIC. CONCLUSION: Compared to timed intercourse, IUI does not increase the pregnancy rate in couples with PCOS and normal semen analysis treated with COH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".