Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
VenueThe European Physical Journal C · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaYork UniversitySimon Fraser UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of ReginaUniversity of VictoriaUniversity of AlbertaUniversité de MontréalUniversity of TorontoTRIUMFCarleton University
FundersHigh Energy PhysicsRoyal Holloway, University of LondonAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaMinistrstvo za visoko šolstvo, znanost in tehnologijoUniverza v LjubljaniNational Academy of Sciences of BelarusBundesministerium für Wissenschaft und ForschungHigh Energy Accelerator Research OrganizationInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesUniversité de GenèveCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueLunds UniversitetNorges ForskningsrådEuropean Regional Development FundMax-Planck-GesellschaftCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueScience and Technology Facilities CouncilSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungUniversity of GlasgowMinisterstvo Průmyslu a ObchoduIsrael Science FoundationVetenskapsrådetFinanciadora de Estudos e ProjetosComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchUniversity College LondonLundbeckfondenMcGill UniversityConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasNational Science CouncilJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekQueen Mary University of LondonHarvard UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyState Atomic Energy Corporation ROSATOMInstitut "Jožef Stefan"Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)CERNCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseUniversität HeidelbergH. Lundbeck A/SUniversité Pierre et Marie CurieIowa State UniversityMichigan State UniversityUniversidad Nacional de La PlataGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyEuropean CommissionLeverhulme TrustJustus Liebig Universität GießenAix-Marseille UniversitéUniversity of MichiganNational Science FoundationMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsAtlas (anatomy)Calorimeter (particle physics)Large Hadron ColliderCalibrationDetectorPhysicsNuclear physicsCosmic rayATLAS experimentTileNuclear engineeringOpticsEngineering
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexThe Tile hadronic calorimeter of the ATLAS detector has undergone extensive testing in the experimental hall since its installation in late 2005. The readout, control and calibration systems have been fully operational since 2007 and the detector has successfully collected data from the LHC single beams in 2008 and first collisions in 2009. This paper gives an overview of the Tile Calorimeter performance as measured using random triggers, calibration data, data from cosmic ray muons and single beam data. The detector operation status, noise characteristics and performance of the calibration systems are presented, as well as the validation of the timing and energy calibration carried out with minimum ionising cosmic ray muons data. The calibration systems' precision is well below the design value of 1%. The determination of the global energy scale was performed with an uncertainty of 4%. © 2010 CERN for the benefit of the ATLAS collaboration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.223
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
