MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122191445 · doi:10.5858/2004-128-574-ehpian

Epiglottic Histoplasmosis Presenting in a Nonendemic Region: A Clinical Mimic of Laryngeal Carcinoma

2004· article· en· W2122191445 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carolyn D. O'Hara, Michael Allegretto, Geoffrey Taylor, Phillip A. Isotalo

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoplasmosisMedicineHistoplasma capsulatumCarcinomaDermatologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Histoplasma capsulatum is a dimorphic fungus endemic to North America. Histoplasmosis is primarily an inhalation-acquired mycosis that is encountered rarely outside of endemic regions. In nonendemic regions, histoplasmosis may present a diagnostic challenge and both clinical and laboratory vigilance are required to accurately identify infection. Unusual clinical presentations with limited physical findings may compound the difficulty in diagnosis. We describe a 78-year-old retired soil science professor who presented with an eroded epiglottic mass secondary to disseminated histoplasmosis in a nonendemic region (Alberta). Clinically, this mass was thought to represent a primary laryngeal carcinoma, as no other buccal or oropharyngeal ulcers were identified. Histoplasmosis was confirmed by tissue biopsy and a positive immunodiffusion test for immunoglobulin G. Disseminated histoplasmosis is often associated with laryngeal and oropharyngeal disease; however, isolated epiglottic histoplasmosis is rare. Histoplasmosis should be included in the differential diagnosis of neoplasms and chronic ulcers of the upper aerodigestive tract.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineSame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207