Catamenial and Noncatamenial, Endometriosis-related or Nonendometriosis-related Pneumothorax Referred for Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: Catamenial and endometriosis-related pneumothorax are considered relatively rare entities. Their clinical characteristics and outcome are incompletely known. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the frequencies, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of catamenial and endometriosis-related pneumothoraces occurring in women with no underlying lung disease referred for surgical treatment. METHODS: Clinical files of all the women of reproductive age referred to our center during a 6-year period for surgical treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax were retrospectively reviewed. Catamenial pneumothorax (CP) was defined as recurrent pneumothorax occurring between the day before and within 72 hours after the onset of menses. All histologic slides were reviewed to confirm initial diagnoses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 114 women underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery; 28 women (24.6%) had CP (right-sided in all but one), and diaphragmatic abnormalities (perforations and/or nodules) were observed in 22 of them. Diaphragmatic abnormalities were seen in 21 of 86 patients with non-CP. Histologic examination found endometriosis, mainly diaphragmatic, in 18 of 28 CPs and 11 of 86 non-CPs. A 6-month antigonadotropic treatment was prescribed postoperatively to women with either CP or endometriosis-related pneumothorax. Mean follow-up was 32.7 (+/-18.5) months. Recurrence rates in CP, non-CP but endometriosis-related, and non-CP non-endometriosis-related pneumothoraces were 32, 27, and 5.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that (1) CP and/or endometriosis-related pneumothoraces account for an important percentage of spontaneous pneumothoraces referred for surgery, (2) diaphragmatic abnormalities seem to play a fundamental role in their pathogenesis, and (3) management is difficult because of the high recurrence rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".