MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122250625 · doi:10.1099/mic.0.26084-0

Inactivation of mshB, a key gene in the mycothiol biosynthesis pathway in Mycobacterium smegmatis

2003· article· en· W2122250625 on OpenAlexaff
Mamta Rawat, Svetozar Kovačević, Helen Billman‐Jacobe, Yossef Av‐Gay

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMycobacterium smegmatisMutantComplementationBiochemistryBiologyEthionamideGeneMycobacterium tuberculosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mshB gene encoding N-acetyl-1-D-myo-inosityl-2-amino-2-deoxy-alpha-D-glucopyranoside deacetylase (MshB) is a key enzyme in mycothiol biosynthesis. Disruption of mshB in Mycobacterium smegmatis resulted in decreased production of mycothiol (5-10 % of the parent strain mc(2)155) but did not abolish mycothiol synthesis completely. Complementation of the MshB(-) mutants with the mshB gene resulted in increased mycothiol production towards the exponential and stationary phases of the bacterial growth cycle. These results suggest that another enzyme is capable of mycothiol biosynthesis by providing N-acetylglucosaminylinositol deacetylation activity in the absence of MshB. One of the candidate enzymes capable of carrying out such reactions is the MshB orthologue mycothiol amide hydrolase, MCA. However, epichromosomal expression of mca in the MshB(-) mutants did not restore mycothiol levels to the level of the parent strain. Unlike other mutants, which have little or no detectable levels of mycothiol, the MshB(-) mutant did not exhibit increased resistance to isoniazid. However, the MshB(-) mutant was resistant to ethionamide. Phenotypic analysis of other mutants lacking mycothiol revealed that MshA(-) mutants also exhibit ethionamide resistance but that a MshC(-)mutant was sensitive to ethionamide, suggesting that mycothiol or its early intermediates influence ethionamide activation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiologySame topicMycobacterium research and diagnosisFrench-language works237,207