Morphological reasoning for the enhanced charge carrier mobility of a hole transport molecule in polystyrene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Pai and coworkers have reported that the charge carrier mobility of the hole transport molecule N,N'-diphenyl-N,N'-bis(3-methylphenyl)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diamine (TPD) is higher with polystyrene (PS) as the host polymer, in comparison to bisphenol A polycarbonate (PC) as the binder. It was proposed that the enhanced interaction of TPD with PC and the effect of the carbonyl dipole are responsible for such a phenomenon.We present a morphological study that lends support to the above proposal. The morphology and thermal behavior of TPD/polystyrene (TPD/PS) composites have been investigated as a binary solid solution and compared with that of the TPD/polycarbonate (TPD/PC) pair. The depression of the glass-transition temperature (Tg ) with the concentration of TPD is more pronounced with PC than with PS. On the other hand, the recovery of the Tg upon annealing is significantly higher in the case of PS. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) study shows that the molecular- level interaction between TPD and PS is not as significant as in the case PC. Molecular modeling based on the MM+ molecular mechanics calculations also shows an electrostatic component to the total interaction energy in the case of PC. In addition, small crystals are present in the as-prepared films of TPD/PS that, upon chaining, could enhance the charge carrier mobility. Thus, it is suggested that the enhanced interaction between TPD and PC as well as the small crystals of TPD in PS are responsible for the higher mobility in the latter. PS serves as an inert host, while there are specific interactions between TPD and PC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".