THE SPINAL CORD INJURY ACTIVE LIVING GUIDE: USEFUL AND DESIRED CONTENT TO ENCOURAGE A HEALTHY AND ACTIVE LIFESTYLE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Regular physical activity for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) has been related to numerous benefits, yet half of this population remains inactive (Martin Ginis et aI.,2010). The SCI community desires useful physical activity infonnation (Boyd & Bardak, 2004). It has been suggested that Canada's Physical Activity Guide for Adults Living with SCI (CPAG-SCI) be created (Martin Ginis & Hicks, 2007). This study sought to detemline what people with SCI would find useful in CP AG-SCI and to establish effective means for providing infonnation to maximize thoughts about being physically active. Firstly, 78 people with SCI (M(age)=45.06) were asked what content to include in CPAG-SCI and how to present it. Participants indicated that physical activity knowledge, motivational infonnation, safety and health infonnation, sources of infonnation and social support, and self-regulation infonnation were desired. CPAG-SCI as a booklet or interactive website was preferred (both 43.6%), text with pictures (83.3%), photographs (57.7%), bright colours (48.7%), simple messages (61.5%), and a calendar pull-out (70.5%). Secondly, the effectiveness of an experimental vignette aimed at changing physical activity social cognitions was explored. Based on the Health Action Process Approach (Schwarzer, 1992; 2004), participants were classified as in the motivational (n=32, M(age)=45.31) or volitional phase (n=47, M(age)=43.36), and then randomly assigned to an experimental or control vignette exposure condition. Social cognitions were measured one-week before, and immediately following, exposure to the vignette. Repeated measures ANOVAs showed that social cognitions generally decreased in those exposed to the experimental vignette, with coping plans approaching a significant decrease among those in the motivational phase (t(17) =2.10, p<.05). Exploratory analyses suggest that perceived similarity to the vignette character may be a key variable contributing to the ineffectiveness of the experimental vignette. Overall, it is suggested that physical activity vignettes in CPAG-SCI not target social cognition change. Keywords: spinal cord injury, physical activity, vignette, perceived similarity, social cognitions
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".