Paternal exposure to cyclophosphamide dysregulates the gene activation program in rat preimplantation embryos
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although there has been progress in determining the mechanisms by which maternal toxicant exposure affects progeny, there is little information on the actions of drugs administered to the father. We investigated the effects of pre-conceptional paternal exposure to cyclophosphamide, an anti-cancer agent, on embryonic gene activation in the rat. The male pronucleus was formed earlier in embryos sired by cyclophosphamide-treated male rats than in those sired by controls; early male pronucleus formation was followed by alterations in the gene activation program. BrUTP incorporation into RNA and Sp1 transcription factor immunostaining were increased and spread over both cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments in 2-cell embryos sired by cyclophosphamide-treated males compared to controls. Total RNA synthesis was constant in 1-8 cell embryos sired by drug-treated fathers, while in control embryos RNA synthesis increased four-fold to peak at the 4-cell stage. In 2-cell embryos sired by drug-treated males, the relative abundance of candidate imprinted genes was elevated significantly above control; a peak in the expression of these genes was not observed until the 8-cell stage in control embryos. Thus, paternal drug exposure temporally and spatially dysregulated rat zygotic gene activation, altering the developmental clock.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it