The relationship between NMDA receptor function and the high ammonia tolerance of anoxia-tolerant goldfish
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute ammonia toxicity in vertebrates is thought to be characterized by a cascade of deleterious events resembling those associated with anoxic/ischemic injury in the central nervous system. A key event is the over-stimulation of neuronal N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, which leads to excitotoxic cell death. The similarity between the responses to acute ammonia toxicity and anoxia suggests that anoxia-tolerant animals such as the goldfish (Carassius auratus Linnaeus) may also be ammonia tolerant. To test this hypothesis, the responses of goldfish were compared with those of the anoxia-sensitive rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum) during exposure to high external ammonia (HEA). Acute toxicity tests revealed that goldfish are ammonia tolerant, with 96 h median lethal concentration (LC(50)) values of 199 μmol l(-1) and 4132 μmol l(-1) for NH(3) and total ammonia ([T(Amm)]=[NH(3)]+[NH(4)(+)]), respectively. These values were ~5-6 times greater than corresponding NH(3) and T(Amm) LC(50) values measured in rainbow trout. Further, the goldfish readily coped with chronic exposure to NH(4)Cl (3-5 mmol l(-1)) for 5 days, despite 6-fold increases in plasma [T] to ~1300 μmol l(-1) and 3-fold increases in brain [T(Amm)] to 6700 μmol l(-1). Muscle [T(Amm)] increased by almost 8-fold from ~900 μmol kg(-1) wet mass (WM) to greater than 7000 μmol kg(-1) WM by 48 h, and stabilized. Although urea excretion rates (J(Urea)) increased by 2-3-fold during HEA, the increases were insufficient to offset the inhibition of ammonia excretion that occurred, and increases in urea were not observed in the brain or muscle. There was a marked increase in brain glutamine concentration at HEA, from ~3000 μmol kg(-1) WM to 15,000 μmol kg(-1) WM after 48 h, which is consistent with the hypothesis that glutamine production is associated with ammonia detoxification. Injection of the NMDA receptor antagonists MK801 (0.5-8 mg kg(-1)) or ethanol (1-8 mg kg(-1)) increased trout survival time by 1.5-2.0-fold during exposure to 2 mmol l(-1) ammonia, suggesting that excitotoxic cell death contributes to ammonia toxicity in this species. In contrast, similar doses of MK801 or ethanol had no effect on ammonia-challenged (8-9.5 mmol l(-1) T(Amm)) goldfish survival times, suggesting that greater resistance to excitotoxic cell death contributes to the high ammonia-tolerance of the goldfish. Whole-cell recordings measured in isolated brain slices of goldfish telencephalon during in vitro exposure to 5 mmol l(-1) or 10 mmol l(-1) T(Amm) reversibly potentiated NMDA receptor currents. This observation suggested that goldfish neurons may not be completely resistant to ammonia-induced excitotoxicity. Subsequent western blot and densitometric analyses revealed that NMDA receptor NR1 subunit abundance was 40-60% lower in goldfish exposed to 3-5 mmol l(-1) T(Amm) for 5 days, which was followed by a restoration of NR1 subunit abundance after 3 days recovery in ammonia-free water. We conclude that the goldfish brain may be protected from excitotoxicity by downregulating the abundance of functional NMDA receptors during periods when it experiences increased internal ammonia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".