MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122437905 · doi:10.1093/res/hgr017

REINGARD M. NISCHIK. Engendering Genre: The Works of Margaret Atwood.

2011· article· en· W2122437905 on OpenAlexaffabout
A. Ridout

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Review of English Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComicsCartoonistLiteratureArtNarrativeArt historyHistoryPoliticsLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book makes an engaging contribution to Margaret Atwood studies. The most exciting and original chapter in the book is Chapter 7 entitled ‘“Survivalwoman, Survivalcreature, Womanwoman”: Atwood as Cartoonist’ which Reingard M. Nischik rightly identifies as ‘the first extended publication on Margaret Atwood's comics’ (p. 195). This chapter situates Atwood’s comics within a brief history of comics in Canada and North America and considers Atwood's references in her other works to comic art, before moving onto close readings of Atwood's Kanadian Kultchur Komix/‘Survivalwoman’ comic series and her Book Tour Comics. Nischik's readings of how nation, gender and genre interplay in Atwood's Kanadian Kultchur Komix/‘Survivalwoman’ comic series is particularly interesting. Looking at Atwood's Book Tour Comics gives an insight into Atwood's wonderfully satirical view of the commercial business of being an author. Nischik's analysis relates productively to Atwood's Negotiating with the Dead: A Writer on Writing by exploring Atwood as a comic artist on writing. Engendering Genre reproduces a number of these comics. Nischik is to be highly commended for gaining the permissions necessary to make this possible as the reproduced comics greatly enhance the chapter for the reader.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Review of English StudiesSame topicComics and Graphic NarrativesFrench-language works237,207