MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122461299 · doi:10.1517/13543784.17.5.811

Roflumilast: an oral, once-daily selective PDE-4 inhibitor for the management of COPD and asthma

2008· review· en· W2122461299 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen K. Field

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhosphodiesterase function and regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryFoothills Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoflumilastMedicineCOPDAsthmaIntensive care medicineLung functionInternal medicineLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Roflumilast is a selective phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor with a broad range of anti-inflammatory actions. Studies in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have demonstrated that it can improve lung function and reduce inflammation. OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical data on roflumilast in COPD and asthma. METHODS: A PubMed search using the term roflumilast was used to identify articles, and the bibliographies of the identified articles were reviewed to identify other relevant reports. All roflumilast abstracts from the 2006 and 2007 International Meetings of the American College of Chest Physicians, American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society were also reviewed. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: The preliminary studies of roflumilast in COPD and asthma have only shown modest clinical benefits and may be associated with gastrointestinal side effects. Further studies are required to clarify the role of roflumilast in the management of COPD and asthma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Investigational DrugsSame topicPhosphodiesterase function and regulationFrench-language works237,207