Conservation of RNA chaperone activity of the human La-related proteins 4, 6 and 7
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The La module is a conserved tandem arrangement of a La motif and RNA recognition motif whose function has been best characterized in genuine La proteins. The best-characterized substrates of La proteins are pre-tRNAs, and previous work using tRNA mediated suppression in Schizosaccharomyces pombe has demonstrated that yeast and human La enhance the maturation of these using two distinguishable activities: UUU-3'OH-dependent trailer binding/protection and a UUU-3'OH independent activity related to RNA chaperone function. The La module has also been identified in several conserved families of La-related proteins (LARPs) that engage other RNAs, but their mode of RNA binding and function(s) are not well understood. We demonstrate that the La modules of the human LARPs 4, 6 and 7 are also active in tRNA-mediated suppression, even in the absence of stable UUU-3'OH trailer protection. Rather, the capacity of these to enhance pre-tRNA maturation is associated with RNA chaperone function, which we demonstrate to be a conserved activity for each hLARP in vitro. Our work reveals insight into the mechanisms by which La module containing proteins discriminate RNA targets and demonstrates that RNA chaperone activity is a conserved function across representative members of the La motif-containing superfamily.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".