Structure, Topology, and Dynamics of Myristoylated Recoverin Bound to Phospholipid Bilayers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recoverin, a member of the EF-hand protein superfamily, serves as a calcium sensor in retinal rod cells. A myristoyl group covalently attached to the N-terminus of recoverin facilitates its binding to retinal disk membranes by a mechanism known as the Ca(2+)-myristoyl switch. Samples of (15)N-labeled Ca(2+)-bound myristoylated recoverin bind anisotropically to phospholipid membranes as judged by analysis of (15)N and (31)P chemical shifts observed in solid-state NMR spectra. On the basis of a (2)H NMR order parameter analysis performed on recoverin containing a fully deuterated myristoyl group, the N-terminal myristoyl group appears to be located within the lipid bilayer. Two-dimensional solid-state NMR ((1)H-(15)N PISEMA) spectra of uniformly and selectively (15)N-labeled recoverin show that the Ca(2+)-bound protein is positioned on the membrane surface such that its long molecular axis is oriented approximately 45 degrees with respect to the membrane normal. The N-terminal region of recoverin points toward the membrane surface, with close contacts formed by basic residues K5, K11, K22, K37, R43, and K84. This orientation of the membrane-bound protein allows an exposed hydrophobic crevice, near the membrane surface, to serve as a potential binding site for the target protein, rhodopsin kinase. Close agreement between experimental and calculated solid-state NMR spectra of recoverin suggests that membrane-bound recoverin retains the same overall three-dimensional structure that it has in solution. These results demonstrate that membrane binding by recoverin is achieved primarily by insertion of the myristoyl group inside the bilayer with apparently little rearrangement of the protein structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".