MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122631161 · doi:10.1002/bip.22145

Effect of amylose deposition on potato tuber starch granule architecture and dynamics as studied by lintnerization

2012· article· en· W2122631161 on OpenAlexaff
Jeanette Wikman, Andreas Blennow, Eric Bertoft

Bibliographic record

VenueBiopolymers · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmylopectinAmyloseChemistryStarchPotato starchGranule (geology)Chemical engineeringFood scienceLamellar structureBotanyCrystallographyMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of amylose deposition on the amylopectin crystalline lamellar organization in potato starch granules was studied by mild acid, so-called lintnerization, of potato tuber starch transgenically engineered to deposit different levels of amylose. The starch granules were subjected to lintnerization at different temperatures (25, 35, and 45°C) and to two levels of solubilization, ∼ 45 and 80%. The rate of the lintnerization increased with temperature but was suppressed by amylose. The molecular size of the lintner dextrins increased with temperature, but this effect was suppressed by the presence of amylose. At high temperatures and low-amylose content, the degree of branches was high with the concomitant increase in size in the dextrins. A portion of the branches was resistant to debranching enzymes possibly due to specific structural formations. The effects of temperature suggested a unique granular architecture of potato starch, and a model showing the dependence of temperature on the dynamic arrangement of amylopectin and amylose in the crystalline and amorphous lamellae for the potato starch is suggested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiopolymersSame topicFood composition and propertiesFrench-language works237,207