Microwave Irradiation of Ethanol-fixed Bone Improves Preservation, Reduces Processing Time, and Allows Both Light and Electron Microscopy on the Same Sample
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Methylmethacrylate (MMA) embedding is routinely used for histomorphometry of undecalcified bone preserved by prolonged immersion in ethanol, a procedure that yields poor ultrastructural detail. Because microwave irradiation (MWI) facilitates penetration of fixatives, we have investigated whether it can improve preservation by ethanol. Rat tibiae, some labeled with tetracycline, and a human iliac crest biopsy were immersed in 70% ethanol and dehydrated, both under MWI, for a total processing time of approximately 7 hr. Controls were not irradiated, and all specimens were embedded in MMA at 4C. They were then processed for histomorphometry, histochemistry, structural analysis, and immunolabeling. The results showed that histological preservation was improved with MWI. Static bone formation and resorption parameters and rate of mineral apposition were similar to those of conventionally processed specimens. Mineral distribution, as visualized by von Kossa staining and backscattered electron imaging, was not affected. Alkaline phosphatase and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity, as well as immunolocalization of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin, were readily visualized. Ultrastructurally, osteopontin exhibited a typical distribution in mineralization foci, between calcified collagen fibrils, and at cement lines. These data show that MWI improves preservation and permits application of a broad spectrum of analytical methodologies on the same bone sample while considerably reducing processing time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".