Thyroid hormone concentrations in systemic circulation and ovarian follicular fluid of cows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine and compare the concentrations of total (T) and free (F) fractions of thyroid hormones (T(3)-triiodithyronine and T(4)-thyroxin) in peripheral circulation and follicular fluid of cows in relation to ovarian follicular status in vivo (Experiment 1), and in the follicles from the slaughterhouse ovaries (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, estrus was synchronized in 15 cows using two Estrumate (cloprostenol sodium) injections (250 mg cloprostenol intramuscular), the time of ovulation (Day 0) was confirmed by ultrasonography, and ovarian antral follicles were ablated on Day 5. The ensuing superovulatory treatment consisted of eight Folltropin-V injections (50 mg intramuscular) administered twice daily from Day 6 to Day 9, followed by two injections of Estrumate (Day 10 am and pm) and a single dose of Lutropin Alfa (Day 11; 750 IU intramuscular). On Day 5, both TT(3) and FT(3) concentrations were greater (P < 0.05) in serum than follicular fluid from dominant (DFs) or subordinate antral follicles (SFs), and TT(4) concentrations were greater (P < 0.05) in DFs compared with SFs. Serum concentrations of FT(4) were greater (P < 0.05) on Day 12 than on Day 5, and TT(4) concentrations in follicular fluid collected on Day 12 were higher than those in DFs and SFs on Day 5. In Experiment 2, there were no differences (P > 0.05) in thyroid hormone concentrations between the largest and all remaining antral follicles visible on the surface of the ovary (n = 20 ovaries). We concluded that: (i) physiological status of bovine antral follicles (i.e. dominant versus subordinate) may impinge on the accumulation of TT(4) in follicular fluid; and (ii) hormonal ovarian superstimulation increases circulating levels of FT(4) and follicular fluid content of TT(4).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".