MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122865964 · doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.01.006

Hypoxemic reperfusion exacerbates the neurological injury sustained during neonatal deep hypothermic circulatory arrest: a model of cyanotic surgical repair☆

2007· article· en· W2122865964 on OpenAlexaff
Edward Hickey, Xiaomang You, Vassil Kaimaktchiev, Ross M. Ungerleider

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenSickKids Foundation
FundersChildren's Heart Foundation
KeywordsMedicineAnesthesiaHypoxemiaDeep hypothermic circulatory arrestIschemiaCerebral perfusion pressureReperfusion injuryCardiologyCerebral blood flow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) is frequently used in infants undergoing the Norwood procedure. These infants are necessarily hypoxemic after separation from CPB. Considerable energy has been spent characterizing the physiological and histological consequences of DHCA, but these have largely focused on a normoxemic period of reperfusion. Furthermore, evidence has accumulated to suggest that the cerebral vascular autoregulatory mechanisms are dysfunctional following DHCA. In particular, the vasodilatation that elevates cerebral blood flow (CBF) in response to hypoxemia is absent. This study therefore aimed to investigate whether post-CPB hypoxemia exacerbates brain injury resulting from DHCA. METHODS: Twelve neonatal piglets were subjected to 2h DHCA and then separated from CPB. They were then randomized to either: Group 1, normoxic ventilation (n=5); or Group 2, hypoxemia (n=7), in which the arterial PaO(2) was reduced to 40-50 mmHg for the duration of reperfusion. Following a 20 h period of warm reperfusion, the animals were perfusion fixed and the brain analyzed for histological evidence of injury. Nine additional animals were studied in one of three control groups. RESULTS: All animals survived the protocol. Post-operative parameters - including mean arterial pressure, acid-base status, inotrope requirements and arterial PaCO(2) - were similar. None of the control animals had any evidence of ischemia. Group 1 animals had moderate injury (total score 7.4+/-1.6). In Group 2, three animals sustained irretrievable brain injury evidenced by gross edema and early liquefactive necrosis. The remaining four had severe ischemic histological changes (score 14.5+/-1.6, p<0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Hypoxemic reperfusion after prolonged DHCA results in increased neuronal loss. The use of DHCA for staged palliation may confer disproportionately greater cerebral risk than other patient groups. Alternatively, methods to augment oxygen delivery - such as by ECMO - may be of particular benefit in the early re-perfusion window.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgerySame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207