L-type Ca<sup>2+</sup>channel function and expression in neonatal rabbit ventricular myocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L-type Ca(2+) channel-mediated, Ca(2+)-induced Ca(2+) release (CICR) is the dominant mode of excitation-contraction (E-C) coupling in the mature mammalian myocardium but is thought to be absent in the fetal and newborn mammalian myocardium. Furthermore, the characteristics and contributors of E-C coupling at the earliest developmental stages are poorly understood. In this study, we measured [(3)H](+)PN200-110 dihydropyridine binding capacity, functionality and expression of the L-type Ca(2+) channel, and cytosolic [Ca(2+)] ([Ca(2+)](i)) at various developmental stages (3, 6, 10, 20, and 56 days old) to characterize ontogenetic changes in E-C coupling. We found that 1) the whole cell L-type Ca(2+) channel peak current (I(Ca)) density increased slightly in parallel with cell growth, but the current-voltage relationship, the steady-state activation, and the maximum DHP binding and binding affinity did not exhibit significant developmental changes; 2) sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) dependence of inactivation rates of L-type Ca(2+) channel and peak of I(Ca) density were only observed after 10 days of age, which temporally coincides with transverse (T)-tubule formation; 3) the relationship between [Ca(2+)](i) and voltage changed from a linear relationship at the earliest developmental stages to a "bell-shaped" relationship at the later developmental stages, presumably corresponding to a switch from reverse-mode Na/Ca exchange-dependent to I(Ca)-dependent E-C coupling; and 4) the expression of two different splice variants of Ca(V)1.2, IVS3A and IVS3B, switched from predominantly IVS3A at the earliest stages to IVS3B at the later developmental stages. Our data suggest that whereas the density of functional dihydropyridine receptors (DHPRs) increases only slightly during ontogeny, the enhancement of functional coupling between DHPR and ryanodine receptor is dramatic between the second and third weeks after birth. Furthermore, we found that the differential expression of splice variants during development temporally correlated with the appearance of I(Ca)-dependent E-C coupling and T-tubule formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".