MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2122971623 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912837

<i>Planck</i>pre-launch status: The<i>Planck</i>-LFI programme

2009· article· en· W2122971623 on OpenAlexafffund
N. Mandolesi, M. Bersanelli, R. C. Butler, E. Artal, C. Baccigalupi, A. Balbi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, Matthias Bartelmann, K. Bennett, Pradeep Bhandari, A. Bonaldi, J. Borrill, L. Pozzetti, C. Burigana, R. C. Bowman, P. Cabella, C. Cantalupo, B. Cappellini, T. Courvoisier, G. Crone, F. Cuttaia, L. Danese, O. D’Arcangelo, R. D. Davies, R. J. Davis, Luigi De Angelis, G. de Gasperis, A. de Rosa, G. De Troia, G. de Zotti, J. Dick, C. Dickinson, J. M. Diego, S. Donzelli, U. Dörl, X. Dupac, T. A. Enßlin, H. K. Eriksen, M. C. Falvella, F. Finelli⋆, M. Frailis, E. Franceschi, T. Gaier, S. Galeotta, F. Gasparo, G. Giardino, F. Gómez, J. González-Nuevo, K. M. Górski, A. Gregorio, A. Gruppuso, F. K. Hansen, R. Hell, D. Herranz, J.M. Herreros, S. R. Hildebrandt, W. Hovest, R. J. Hoyland, K. M. Huffenberger, M. A. Janssen, T. R. Jaffe, E. Keihänen, R. Keskitalo, T. S. Kisner, H. Kurki‐Suonio, A. Lähteenmäki, C. R. Lawrence, S. Leach, J. P. Leahy, R. Leonardi, S. Levin, P. B. Lilje, M. López-Caniego, Stuart Lowe, P. M. Lubin, D. Maino, M. Malaspina, M. Maris, J. Martí-Canales, E. Martínez-González, M. Massardi, S. Matarrese, F. Matthai, P. R. Meinhold, A. Melchiorri, L. Mendes, A. Mennella, G. Morgante, G. Morigi, N. Morisset, A. Moss, Al Nash, P. Natoli, R. Nesti, C. Paine, B. Partridge, F. Pasian, Thomas Passvogel, D. Pearson, L. Pérez-Cuevas, F. Perrotta, G. Polenta, L. Popa, T. Poutanen, G. Prézeau, M. Prina, J. P. Rachen, R. Rébolo, M. Reinecke, S. Ricciardi, T. Riller, G. Rocha, N. Roddis, R. Rohlfs, J. A. Rubiño-Martín, Emanuele Salerno, M. Sandri, D. Scott, M. D. Seiffert, Joseph Silk, A. Simonetto, G. F. Smoot, C. Sozzi, J. Sternberg, F. Stivoli, L. Stringhetti, J. A. Tauber, L. Terenzi, M. Tomasi, J. Tuovinen, M. Türler, L. Valenziano, J. Varis, P. Vielva, F. Villa, N. Vittorio, L. A. Wade, Martin White, Simon D. M. White, A. Wilkinson, A. Zacchei, A. Zonca

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilCanadian Space AgencyMax-Planck-GesellschaftAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaTekesBundesministerium für Wirtschaft und TechnologieAcademy of FinlandMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikEuropean Space AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPlanckCosmic microwave backgroundPhysicsSkyCalibrationAstronomyContext (archaeology)Microwave radiometerAstrophysicsCosmic background radiationRemote sensingSystems engineeringSatelliteEngineeringOpticsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides an overview of the Low Frequency Instrument (LFI) programme within the ESA <i>Planck <i/> mission. The LFI instrument has been developed to produce high precision maps of the microwave sky at frequencies in the range 27–77 GHz, below the peak of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation spectrum. The scientific goals are described, ranging from fundamental cosmology to Galactic and extragalactic astrophysics. The instrument design and development are outlined, together with the model philosophy and testing strategy. The instrument is presented in the context of the <i>Planck <i/> mission. The LFI approach to ground and inflight calibration is described. We also describe the LFI ground segment. We present the results of a number of tests demonstrating the capability of the LFI data processing centre (DPC) to properly reduce and analyse LFI flight data, from telemetry information to calibrated and cleaned time ordered data, sky maps at each frequency (in temperature and polarization), component emission maps (CMB and diffuse foregrounds), catalogs for various classes of sources (the Early Release Compact Source Catalogue and the Final Compact Source Catalogue). The organization of the LFI consortium is briefly presented as well as the role of the core team in data analysis and scientific exploitation. All tests carried out on the LFI flight model demonstrate the excellent performance of the instrument and its various subunits. The data analysis pipeline has been tested and its main steps verified. In the first three months after launch, the commissioning, calibration, performance, and verification phases will be completed, after which <i>Planck <i/> will begin its operational life, in which LFI will have an integral part.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations122
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207