The role of venous capacitance, circulating catecholamines, and heart rate in the hemodynamic response to increased temperature and hypoxia in the dogfish
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypoxia and increased temperature alter venous blood pressures in teleosts through active changes in venous tone. Elasmobranchs possess a capacious venous system but have limited adrenergic vascular innervation and subambient central venous pressure (P(cv)). In this study, we explored venous hemodynamic responses to acute temperature increase and moderate (6.9 kPa) and severe (2.5 kPa) hypoxia in the dogfish (Squalus acanthias). Normoxic dogfish at 10 degrees C had a P(cv) between -0.08 and -0.04 kPa and a mean circulatory filling pressure (P(mcf)) of approximately 0.12 kPa. At 16 degrees C, heart rate (f(H)), cardiac output (Q), and P(mcf) increased but P(cv) and plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine levels were unchanged. In contrast, moderate and severe hypoxia increased P(cv) and decreased Q and stroke volume (V(S)). f(H) decreased in severe hypoxia, whereas P(mcf) was unaffected despite elevated catecholamine levels. Atropine abolished hypoxic reductions in Q, V(S), and f(H), but P(cv) still increased. In contrast to the response in teleosts, this study on dogfish suggests that venous capacitance changes associated with warming and hypoxia are minimal and likely not mediated by circulating catecholamines. Thus hemodynamic status of the capacious elasmobranch venous circulation is potentially regulated by blood volume shifts from passive flow-mediated events and possibly through myogenic mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".