MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123019532 · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/221/2/27

THE SDSS-IV EXTENDED BARYON OSCILLATION SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY: QUASAR TARGET SELECTION

2015· article· en· W2123019532 on OpenAlexafffund
Adam D. Myers, N. Palanque‐Delabrouille, Abhishek Prakash, Isabelle Pâris, Christophe Yèche, Kyle Dawson, Jo Bovy, Dustin Lang, David J. Schlegel, Jeffrey A. Newman, Patrick Petitjean, Jean‐Paul Kneib, Pierre Laurent, Will J. Percival, Ashley J. Ross, Hee‐Jong Seo, Jeremy L. Tinker, E. Armengaud, Joel R. Brownstein, E. Burtin, Zheng Cai, Johan Comparat, M. M. Kasliwal, S. R. Kulkarni, Russ R. Laher, D. Levitan, Cameron K. McBride, Ian D. McGreer, Adam A. Miller, P. Nugent, E. O. Ofek, Graziano Rossi, John J. Ruan, Donald P. Schneider, Branimir Sesar, A. Streblyanska, J. Surace

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratorySmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryScience and Technology Facilities CouncilUniversity of Colorado BoulderJet Propulsion LaboratoryInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieYork UniversityCarnegie Institution for ScienceCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoUniversity of WashingtonAlfred P. Sloan FoundationJohns Hopkins UniversityCarnegie Institution of WashingtonUniversity of UtahOhio State UniversityU.S. Department of EnergySmithsonian InstitutionMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikCalifornia Institute of TechnologyMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of PortsmouthYale UniversityVanderbilt UniversityLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversity of Notre DameAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsQuasarPhysicsAstrophysicsSkyRedshiftBaryonSpectral lineAstronomyGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) IV the extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey ( eBOSS ) will improve measurements of the cosmological distance scale by applying the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) method to quasar samples. eBOSS will adopt two approaches to target quasars over 7500 deg 2 . First, a "CORE" quasar sample will combine the optical selection in ugriz using a likelihood-based routine called XDQSOz , with a mid-IR-optical color cut. eBOSS CORE selection (to g < 22 or r < 22) should return ∼70 deg −2 quasars at redshifts 0.9 < z < 2.2 and ∼7 deg −2 z > 2.1 quasars. Second, a selection based on variability in multi-epoch imaging from the Palomar Transient Factory should recover an additional ∼3–4 deg −2 z > 2.1 quasars to g < 22.5. A linear model of how imaging systematics affect target density recovers the angular distribution of eBOSS CORE quasars over 96.7% (76.7%) of the SDSS north (south) Galactic Cap area. The eBOSS CORE quasar sample should thus be sufficiently dense and homogeneous over 0.9 < z < 2.2 to yield the first few-percent-level BAO constraint near eBOSS quasars at z > 2.1 will be used to improve BAO measurements in the Ly α Forest. Beyond its key cosmological goals, eBOSS should be the next-generation quasar survey, comprising >500,000 new quasars and >500,000 uniformly selected spectroscopically confirmed 0.9 < z < 2.2 quasars. At the conclusion of eBOSS , the SDSS will have provided unique spectra for more than 800,000 quasars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations195
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207