NUCLEOMORPH KARYOTYPE DIVERSITY IN THE FRESHWATER CRYPTOPHYTE GENUS <i>CRYPTOMONAS</i><sup>1</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cryptophytes are unicellular, biflagellate algae with plastids (chloroplasts) derived from the uptake of a red algal endosymbiont. These organisms are unusual in that the nucleus of the engulfed red alga persists in a highly reduced form called a nucleomorph. Nucleomorph genomes are remarkable in their small size (<1,000 kilobase pairs [kbp]) and high degree of compaction (∼1 kbp per gene). Here, we investigated the molecular and karyotypic diversity of nucleomorph genomes in members of the genus Cryptomonas. 18S rDNA genes were amplified, sequenced, and analyzed from C. tetrapyrenoidosa Skuja CCAP979/63, C. erosa Ehrenb. emmend. Hoef-Emden CCAP979/67, Cryptomonas sp. CCAP979/52, C. lundii Hoef-Emden et Melkonian CCAP979/69, and C. lucens Skuja CCAP979/35 in the context of a large set of publicly available nucleomorph 18S rDNA sequences. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to examine the nucleomorph genome karyotype of each of these strains. Individual chromosomes ranged from ∼160 to 280 kbp in size, with total genome sizes estimated to be ∼600-655 kbp. Unexpectedly, the nucleomorph karyotype of Cryptomonas sp. CCAP979/52 is significantly different from that of C. tetrapyrenoidosa and C. lucens, despite the fact that their 18S rDNA genes are >99% identical to one another. These results suggest that nucleomorph karyotype similarity is not a reliable indicator of evolutionary affinity and provides a starting point for further investigation of the fine-scale dynamics of nucleomorph genome evolution within members of the genus Cryptomonas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".