MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Organizational Operation of Farmers’ Specialized Technology Association (FSTA) in Yuanshi County Hebei Province

2009· article· en· W2123074730 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gao Xue-lian

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCooperative Studies and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJoint-stock companyStock (firearms)Political scienceJoint (building)Property rightsBusinessWelfare economicsHumanitiesGeographyLawEngineeringEconomicsPhilosophyArchaeologyCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper examines NPO, a FSTA in Yushi County Hebei Province, focusing its organizational operation and evolvement process of property right system. The paper found that evolvement of property rights system is experiencing a ‘Cooperative System →Joint Stock Cooperative System → Joint Stock System’ process. Other newly established associations might replace the previous functions of mutual aid and service. Key words: Organizational Framework, Organizational Operation, Property Rights System Resume: Cet essai examine une organisation non lucrative, un FSTA dans la region Yuxi de la province du Hubei, se concentrant sur son operation organisationnelle et l’evolution de son systeme du droit de propriete. L’essai trouve que l’evolution du systeme du droit de propriete connait un tel processus : Systeme cooperatif→ Systeme cooperatif de stock joint→ Systeme de stock joint. D’autres associations dernieremment etablies pourraient remplacer les fonctions precedentes d’aide mutuelle et de service. Mots-Cles: cadre organisationnel, operation organisationnelle, systeme du droit de propriete

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.784

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicCooperative Studies and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207