MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123175122 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu149

ECG pitfall: anterior myocardial infarction in dextrocardia

2014· article· es· W2123175122 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sergio Richter, Michael Döring, Steffen Desch, Gerhard Hindricks

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill UniversityPfizerBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicineDextrocardiaCardiologyMyocardial infarctionInternal medicineChest painTroponinAcute coronary syndromeCoronary care unit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 74-year-old female was admitted to our chest pain unit with a troponin-positive acute coronary syndrome. The standard 12-lead electrocardiogram showed typical features of dextrocardia including atrial and ventricular inversion characterized by a reversal of polarity in leads I and aVL, QS and rS patterns in the precordial leads with progressive decrease in S-wave amplitude from the right to left praecordium (Panel A). No significant ST-segment elevation could be discerned. Reversed lead positioning unmasked ST-segment elevation in the right-sided precordial leads V3R–V5R (Panel B). Coronary angiography revealed subtotal occlusion of the distal left anterior descending coronary artery (Panel C). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging performed after successful percutaneous coronary intervention showed a left ventricular apical aneurysm associated with thrombus formation and moderately reduced left ventricular systolic function (Panel D). Right-sided precordial lead recording (V3R–V6R) may not only detect right ventricular involvement complicating inferior myocardial infarction but also unmask ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in rare cases of dextrocardia where standard lead positioning is inconclusive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicCardiac Structural Anomalies and RepairFrench-language works237,207