Recent developments with live‐attenuated recombinant paramyxovirus vaccines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is no vaccine currently approved for paramyxovirus-induced respiratory diseases in humans, despite their major clinical importance. We review the development and evaluation of new vaccine strategies based on live-attenuated chimeric and recombinant vaccines against human respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus and human parainfluenza viruses types 1 to 3, which are significant causes of upper and lower tract respiratory diseases. Most promising strategies are based on virus attenuation through (i) mutations in key genes involved in replication; (ii) deletion of accessory genes; or (iii) the use of a corresponding animal viral vector, such as bovine parainfluenza type 3 and Sendai virus, as a background for the expression of a viral glycoprotein. Indeed, the fusion (F), or attachment (HN/H/G) glycoproteins are the most immunogenic antigens in paramyxoviruses. For each strategy, we will review the immunogenicity (increase in neutralising antibody titres) and the protection conferred by the most promising recombinant vectored vaccines and list ongoing clinical trials. We will conclude by discussing the most important challenges regarding the introduction of such vaccines into immunisation programmes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it