MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123415654 · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.90478.2008

Caloric restriction optimizes the proteasome pathway with aging in rat plantaris muscle: implications for sarcopenia

2008· article· en· W2123415654 on OpenAlexaff
Russell T. Hepple, Hideko Nakamoto, Sataro Goto

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSarcopeniaProteasomeCalorie restrictionInternal medicineEndocrinologySkeletal muscleSenescencePlantaris muscleProtein degradationCalorieBiologyChemistryBiochemistryMedicineSoleus muscle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To gain insight into the significance of alterations in the proteasome pathway for sarcopenia and its attenuation by calorie restriction, we examined protein oxidation and components of the proteasome pathway in plantaris muscle in 8-, 30-, and 35-mo-old ad libitum-fed (AL) rats; and in 8-, 35-, and 40-mo-old calorie-restricted (CR) rats. We hypothesized that CR rats would exhibit a lesser accumulation of protein carbonyls with aging and that this would be associated with a better maintenance of skeletal muscle proteasome activity and function with aging. Consistent with this view, whereas AL rats had a significant increase in protein carbonylation with aging, there was no such increase in CR rats. Protein levels of the ubiquitin ligases MuRF1 and MAFbx increased similarly with aging in both AL and CR rats. On the other hand, chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome increased with aging more gradually in CR rats, and this increase was paralleled by increases in the expression of the C2 subunit in both groups, suggesting that differences in activity were not related to differences in proteasome function with aging. Interestingly, the plot of muscle mass vs. proteasome activity showed that the oldest animals in both diets had a lower muscle mass than would be predicted by their proteasome activity, suggesting that other factors explain the acceleration of sarcopenia at advanced age. Since calorie restriction better protects skeletal muscle function than muscle mass with aging (Hepple RT, Baker DJ, Kaczor JJ, Krause DJ, FASEB J 19: 1320-1322, 2005), and our current results show that this protection of function is associated with a prevention of oxidative protein damage accumulation, we suggest that calorie restriction optimizes the proteasome pathway to preserve skeletal muscle function at the expense of modest muscle atrophy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.650

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative PhysiologySame topicMuscle metabolism and nutritionFrench-language works237,207