Activities and participation in young adults with Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this cross-sectional study was to compare the activities and participation in the domains of mobility, self-care, domestic life and social functioning in young adults according to osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) type. Fifty-four former OI patients were invited to participate and were sent a structured questionnaire. Twenty-four patients (mean age: 25.0 years, SD: 2.6 years) with OI types I (n=7), III (n=7), IV (n =8) and V (n=2) completed the questionnaire. Participants with OI type I reported full independence, and only few respondents with OI types IV and V reported some limitations in mobility and domestic life activities. Young adults with OI type III had significantly lower activity scores in aspects of mobility and domestic life and lower levels of participation in employment, sporting activities and transportation. Participation in leisure and social interactions were not different across OI types. Young adults with more severe types of osteogenesis imperfecta have greater activity limitations and participation restrictions. Our findings indicate the importance of promoting and facilitating involvement in meaningful activities and roles in young adults with moderate to severe forms of OI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".