Partitioning mycorrhizal influence on water relations of <i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i> into soil and plant components
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is growing appreciation of arbuscular mycorrhizal effects on soil properties and their potential consequences on plant behavior. We examined the possibility that mycorrhizal soil may directly influence plant water relations. Using wild-type and noncolonizing bean mutants planted into soils previously produced using mycorrhizal or nonmycorrhizal sorghum plants, we partitioned mycorrhizal influence on stomatal conductance and drought resistance into soil and root components, testing whether effects of mycorrhizal fungi occurred mostly via mycorrhization of roots, mycorrhization of soil, or both. The mutation itself had no effect on any water relations parameter. Colonization by Gigaspora margarita Gerdemann & Trappe and Glomus intraradices Schenck & Smith had appreciable effects on leaf water potential at the lethal point and on osmotic adjustment, relative to nonmycorrhizal plants of comparable size. Mycorrhizal effects on drought resistance were attributable to an effect on the plant itself rather than to an effect of mycorrhizal soil. Mycorrhizal effects on stomatal conductance were attributable to mycorrhization of both roots and soil, as well as to mycorrhization of roots alone. Surprisingly, merely growing in a mycorrhizal soil resulted in promotion of stomatal conductance of nonmycorrhizal plants in both amply watered and droughted plants. Mycorrhizal effects on droughted plants did not appear to be related to altered soil water retention properties, as Gigaspora margarita and Glomus intraradices altered the soil's moisture characteristic curve only slightly.Key words: arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis, bean, drought, Gigaspora margarita, Glomus intraradices, stomatal conductance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".