HLA-DQA1 genotyping of Helicobacter pylori associated gastritis patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To study HLA-DQA1 genotyping in Helicobacter pylori associated gastritis patients. This study was carried out in College of Medicine, University of Basrah. HLA-DQA1 genotyping was done in College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada during the period from 17th of April 2009 to 15th of July 2010. A total of 100 patients (41 males and 59 females and a total of 30 controls (18 males and 12 females) were included in this study. DQA1 alleles frequencies were studied in 70H. pylori associated gastritis patients and 30 healthy controls. DQA1*0201 decreased allele frequency was statistically not significant in H. pylori associated gastritis patients, but there was a strong association (odds ratio= 2.61(, as compared with controls. In the present study many alleles from both locus showed high frequencies with a very strong association, but statistically not significant, this association has not been reported and it is important to note that a larger sample size should be studied. Key words: HLA-DQA1 genotyping, DQA1*0201, Helicobacter
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".