Slow geminate‐charge‐pair recombination dynamics at polymer: Fullerene heterojunctions in efficient organic solar cells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We explore charge recombination dynamics at electron donor‐acceptor heterojunctions, formed between a semiconductor polymer (PCDTBT) and a fullerene derivative (PC 70 BM), by means of combined time‐resolved photoluminescence and transient absorption spectroscopies. Following prompt exciton dissociation across the heterojunction, a subset of bound electron‐hole pairs recombines with a temperature‐independent rate distribution spanning submicrosecond timescales to produce luminescent charge‐transfer excitons (CTX). At 14 K, this slow mechanism is the dominant geminate charge recombination pathway, whereas we also observe CTX emission on subnanosecond timescales at 293 K. We thus find that at these temperatures, a fraction of the initial charge‐pair population is trapped deeply such that they only recombine slowly over a broad distribution of timescales by quantum tunneling. We identify geminate polaron pairs (GPP) as a reservoir of long‐lived localized states that repopulate the CTX up to microsecond timescales. The observation of such distributed geminate‐charge recombination highlights the importance of the molecular nature of specific donor–acceptor electronic interactions in defining the relaxation pathways of trapped GPP. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys, 2012
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it