MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

β‐1,6‐Glucan synthesis in <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>

2000· review· en· W2123635521 on OpenAlexafffund
Serge Shahinian, Howard Bussey

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPolysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeBiologyGlycanChitinCell wallBiochemistryGlucanGeneComputational biologyPolysaccharideBiosynthesisCell biologyGlycoproteinChitosan

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

beta-1,6-Glucan is an essential fungal-specific component of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall that interconnects all other wall components into a lattice. Considerable biochemical and genetic effort has been directed at the identification and characterization of the steps involved in its biosynthesis. Structural studies show that the polymer plays a central role in wall structure, attaching mannoproteins via their glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) glycan remnant to beta-1,3-glucan and chitin. Genetic approaches have identified genes that upon disruption result in beta-1,6-glucan defects of varying severity, often with reduced growth or lethality. These gene products have been localized throughout the secretory pathway and at the cell surface, suggesting a possible biosynthetic route. Current structural and genetic data have therefore allowed the development of models to predict biosynthetic events. Based on knowledge of beta-1,3-glucan and chitin synthesis, it is likely that the bulk of beta-1,6-glucan polymer synthesis occurs at the cell surface, but requires key prior intracellular events. However, the activity of most of the identified gene products remain unknown, making it unclear to what extent and how directly they contribute to the synthesis of this polymer. With the recent availability of new tools, reagents and methods (including genomics), the field is poised for a convergence of biochemical and genetic methods to identify and characterize the biochemical steps in the synthesis of this polymer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations181
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MicrobiologySame topicPolysaccharides and Plant Cell WallsFrench-language works237,207