MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123658044 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2009.2027901

Implementation of the Three-Phase Switched Reluctance Machine System for Motors and Generators

2009· article· en· W2123658044 on OpenAlexaff
Hao Chen, Jason Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwitched reluctance motorControl theory (sociology)Reluctance motorComputer scienceTorqueEngineeringRotor (electric)Electrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents two three-phase switched reluctance machine systems. One is the dual motors drive for the electric locomotive traction; the other is the variable-speed generator system for wind power applications. The principles of the switched reluctance machine system operated at four quadrants, the scheme of the symmetrical traction at quadrant I and quadrant III, and the scheme of the symmetrical regenerative braking control at quadrant II and quadrant IV, are given. The transient phase current analysis and the energy analysis of the switched reluctance machine system at the operational state of braking or generating are evaluated, and the rotor position and the peak value of the phase current at three different conditions are given. The closed-loop rotor speed control of the main motor, synchronization of the rotor speed, and balance distribution of loads between the main motor and the subordinate motor have been implemented by the fuzzy logic algorithm. The closed-loop output power control of the switched reluctance wind power generator system implemented by regulating the turn-on angle of the main switches with fuzzy logic algorithm and fixed turn-off angle of the main switches is also presented. The major components of the two prototypes are explained in detail. The experimental results of the dual 7.5-kW three-phase 6/4 structure switched reluctance motors (SRMs) parallel drive system prototype are included. It is shown that the maximum difference in the output torque of the two motors at the same given rotor speeds is within 10.00% and the maximum difference in the practical rotor speed of the two motors is within 5.00%. The tested results of three-phase 12/8 structure switched reluctance variable-speed wind power generator system show that the error of the closed-loop output power control is within 2.2%, while the rotor speed range is close to the ratio of 1:3 with the low rotor speed 405 r/min. The average dc line current of the power converter can be utilized as a feedback signal for the actual output torque of SRM drive or a feedback signal for the actual output power of switched reluctance generator system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations185
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ASME Transactions on MechatronicsSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207