MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123721997 · doi:10.1021/je050217e

Solubility of CaSO<sub>4</sub>Phases in Aqueous HCl + CaCl<sub>2</sub>Solutions from 283 K to 353 K

2005· article· en· W2123721997 on OpenAlexaff
Zhibao Li, George P. Demopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolubilityChemistryDissolutionAnhydriteAqueous solutionIsothermal processInorganic chemistryAtmospheric temperature rangeNuclear chemistryGypsumOrganic chemistryThermodynamicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solubilities of calcium sulfate dihydrate, hemihydrate, and anhydrite in concentrated HCl, CaCl 2, and their mixed aqueous solutions were measured by using the classic isothermal dissolution method at the temperature range from (283 to 353) K. The concentration investigated for HCl is up to 12 mol·dm -3 and for CaCl 2 is up to 3.5 mol·dm -3 at room temperature. The solubility of CaSO 4 phases in all cases investigated was found to increase with the temperature increment with the exception of anhydrite in CaCl 2 solutions. In pure HCl media, increasing the acid concentration in the range of (0.0 to 3) mol·dm -3 HCl causes the solubility of CaSO 4 ·2H 2 O or CaSO 4 to increase reaching a maximum value and then decrease gradually with further increasing HCl concentration. In the concentrated range of (8 to 12) mol·dm -3 HCl, the solubility of CaSO 4 · 1 / 2 H 2 O decreases with acid concentration. In HCl + CaCl 2 mixed media, the addition of CaCl 2 causes the solubility of all three phases to decrease due apparently to common ion effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations99
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical & Engineering DataSame topicChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous SolutionsFrench-language works237,207