MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123773757 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1336-9_10

Infinite Horizon Dynamic Games with Coupled State Constraints

2000· book-chapter· en· W2123773757 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBirkhäuser Boston eBooks · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic theories and models
Canadian institutionsGroup for Research in Decision AnalysisHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstraint (computer-aided design)Mathematical economicsSequential gameMathematical optimizationDifferential gameFunction (biology)State (computer science)OligopolyMathematicsClass (philosophy)Applied mathematicsComputer scienceGame theoryCournot competition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we investigate the existence of equilibrium solutions to a class of infinite-horizon differential games with a coupled state constraint. These differential games typically represent dynamic oligopoly models where each firm controls its own dynamics (decoupled controls). In the absence of a coupled state constraint, the interactions among players take place essentially in the objective function. The introduction of a coupled state constraint in such models can be motivated, for example, by the consideration of a global environmental constraint imposed on competing firms. Our approach for the characterization of asymptotic equilibria under such a constraint is an adaptation of Rosen’s normalized equilibrium concept [10] to this infinite-horizon dynamic game framework. We utilize the Turnpike property and the notion of an attracting normalized steady-state equilibrium for the definition of a time invariant multiplier to provide conditions for the existence of dynamic equilibria. We consider discounted and undiscounted dynamic game models in our investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it