<i>In vivo</i> Recombination After Chronic Damage Exposure Falls to Below Spontaneous Levels in “Recombomice”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
All forms of cancer are initiated by heritable changes in gene expression. Although point mutations have been studied extensively, much less is known about homologous recombination events, despite its role in causing sequence rearrangements that contribute to tumorigenesis. Although transgenic mice that permit detection of point mutations have provided a fundamental tool for studying point mutations in vivo, until recently, transgenic mice designed specifically to detect homologous recombination events in somatic tissues in vivo did not exist. We therefore created fluorescent yellow direct repeat mice, enabling automated detection of recombinant cells in vivo for the first time. Here, we show that an acute dose of ionizing radiation induces recombination in fluorescent yellow direct repeat mice, providing some of the first direct evidence that ionizing radiation induces homologous recombination in cutaneous tissues in vivo. In contrast, the same total dose of radiation given under chronic exposure conditions suppresses recombination to levels that are significantly below those of unexposed animals. In addition, global methylation is suppressed and key DNA repair proteins are induced in tissues from chronically irradiated animals (specifically AP endonuclease, polymerase beta, and Ku70). Thus, increased clearance of recombinogenic lesions may contribute to suppression of homologous recombination. Taken together, these studies show that fluorescent yellow direct repeat mice provide a rapid and powerful assay for studying the recombinogenic effects of both short-term and long-term exposure to DNA damage in vivo and reveal for the first time that exposure to ionizing radiation can have opposite effects on genomic stability depending on the duration of exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".