Insonation of the Eye in the Presence of Microbubbles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the presence and duration of vascular permeability changes induced by the combination of ultrasound and an intravascular microbubble contrast agent in the rabbit eye. METHODS: Five eyes were studied in 8 anaesthetized rabbits. Insonation was performed with a diagnostic B-mode system (center frequency = 2 MHz; mechanical index [MI] = 0.2 and 1.7) for 5 minutes after administration of perflutren microbubbles (0.07 mL/kg). Fluorescein fundus angiography was performed before and 3 minutes after insonation; at 6 minutes, color fundus photography was used to assess the dye leakage, bleeding, and alteration of the diameter of fundus vessels. RESULTS: Alteration of fundus vessel diameters was observed in 1 of 5 cases at a low MI and in 4 of 5 cases at a higher MI. In 1 case, leakage of fluorescein indicated increased permeability at the higher MI. No bleeding was detected in any case. CONCLUSIONS: The permeability change induced by insonation and this dose of an ultrasound contrast agent appears to be transient under the conditions studied, although the time delay between insonation and optical assessment limits the completeness of the findings. This preliminary study may be relevant to drug delivery strategies using ultrasound and microbubbles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".