Al-Qaida Between Ideology and Technology: Electronic Jihad From September 11 to the Assassination of Bin Laden
Bibliographic record
Abstract
More than ten years elapsed between the bloody events of September 2001 that hit the United States (US) and the assassination of al-Qaida’s leader, Osama Bin Laden, in 2011. To understand the relationship between these two events and to analyze them from a political and intellectual viewpoint, the analysis must expand to include the role of the media, especially the “alternative media”, and its impact as an important weapon in the hands of this “extremist” Islamic organization. Al-Qaida, which existed in the middle of 1990, pledged to use all political and military means and media (De Cessole, 2012, p.74) to fight what was called “the far enemy”, i.e. the West and its allies, particularly the US (Kepel, 2004, p.113). The latter had emerged victorious from the ‘cold war’ that had lasted for more than half of a century and had ended with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Eastern bloc, and the dominance of liberal concepts: democracy, human rights, and market economy (Al Shalabi, 2000, p.7). On the other hand, the political changes in the light of information and communication revolution led to the emergence of extreme ideas pursued by violent fundamentalist groups combining two types of extremism: religious and political (Jones Stevens, 1998), which are incompatible with the principles of democracy, freedom of opinion, expression, religion tolerance, and others (Armstrong, 2000). Al-Qaida’s dialectical relationship between ideology and technology concentrates on the youth who are able to use social networking tools, such as the Internet, Facebook, and Twitter, which “exceeded the traditional means like radio, television, and newspapers” (Penn, 2003) to recruit or to induce them to embrace the ideas and principles they seek to disseminate. To analyze and understand the role of alternative media in the war between al-Qaida and the West and its allies, we will investigate the phenomenon of the technological means used by al-Qaida to achieve its objectives and to disseminate its ideas through three major axes: The beginning of a Jihad media, the “holy” media strategy, and shedding light on the media institutions owned by this organization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".