Novel Multistage Three-Dimensional Medical Image Segmentation: Methodology and Validation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a novel multistage method for three-dimensional (3-D) segmentation of medical images and a new radial distance-based segmentation validation approach. For the 3-D segmentation method, we first employ a morphological recursive erosion operation to reduce the connectivity between the region of interest and its surrounding neighborhood; then we design a hybrid segmentation method to achieve an initial result. The hybrid approach integrates an improved fast marching method and a morphological reconstruction algorithm. Finally, a morphological recursive dilation is employed to recover any lost structure from the first stage of the multistage method. This approach is tested on 12 CT and 3 MRI images of the brain, heart, and kidney, to demonstrate the effectiveness and accuracy of this technique across a variety of imaging modalities and organ systems. In order to validate the multistage segmentation method, a novel radial distance-based validation method is proposed that uses a global accuracy (GA) measure. The GA is calculated based on local radial distance errors (LRDE), where LRDE are calculated on the radii emitted from points along the skeleton of the object rather than the centroid, in order to accommodate more complicated organ structures. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed multistage segmentation method is fast and accurate, with comparable performance to existing segmentation methods, but with a significantly higher execution speed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".