Major depression among medically ill elders contributes to sustained poor mental health in their informal caregivers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: No longitudinal studies have addressed the effect of late life depression on the physical and mental health status of their informal caregivers. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a diagnosis of depression in older medical inpatients is associated with the physical and mental health status of their informal caregivers after 6 months, independent of the physical health of the care recipient. DESIGN: Longitudinal observational study with 6-month follow-up. SETTING: Two Montreal acute-care hospitals. SUBJECTS: A sample of 97 cognitively intact medical inpatients aged 65 and over and their informal caregivers, with oversampling of patients with a diagnosis of major or minor depression. METHODS: Patient data included depression (current diagnosis, duration of current diagnosis, severity of symptoms, and history of depression), physical health (severity of illness, comorbidity, premorbid disability), and cognitive impairment. Caregiver data included relationship to patient, co-residence, and the physical and mental health status subscales of the SF-36. Multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted to determine the relationship between patient depression and caregiver 6 month SF-36 physical and mental scores, adjusting for baseline values, patient comorbidity, disability, and other patient and caregiver variables. RESULTS: Patient characteristics included: mean age 79.3, 62% female, 46% major depression, 18% minor depression, 36% no depression. Caregiver characteristics included: 73% female, 35% co-resident spouse, 15% other co-resident relation, 50% not residing with the patient. Results of the multivariate analyses showed that in comparison with caregivers of patients without a current diagnosis of depression, caregivers of those with major depression had a lower mental health score at follow-up (-9.54, 95% CI -16.66, -2.43), even though their physical health was slightly better (5.42 95% CI 0.04, 10.81). CONCLUSIONS: A diagnosis of major depression in older medical inpatients is independently associated with poor mental health in their informal caregivers 6 months later.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".