MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2123965997 · doi:10.1080/1364436042000200834

Retrospective spiritual narratives: exploring recalled childhood and adolescent spiritual experiences

2004· article· en· W2123965997 on OpenAlexaffabout
Daniel G. Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Children s Spirituality · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativePsychologyReligious experienceDevelopmental psychologyRecallPsychotherapistPsychoanalysisCognitive psychologyEpistemologyLiteratureArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper draws on a collection of retrospective narratives of childhood and adolescent spiritual experiences to explore the qualities and characteristics of the spirituality of the young. They recall a range of spiritual experiences that touch on death, mortality, visions, and perceptions and connections beyond the self. Their experiences include varying intensities of emotion and invoke a range of responses in them and others. The paper considers the social, emotional and familial context of these early life experiences and their impact on spiritual experience and the possibility/impossibility and freedom/lack of freedom to express, and integrate spirituality. Keywords: Adolescent spiritual experiencesRetrospective spiritual narratives Notes ∗ School of Child & Youth Care, PO Box 1700 STN CSC. University of Victoria. Victoria BC, V8W 2Y2 Canada, Email: dgscott@uvic.ca All names used are pseudonyms and the numbers following are the ages at the time of the experience. Additional informationNotes on contributorsDaniel G. Scott Footnote∗ ∗ School of Child & Youth Care, PO Box 1700 STN CSC. University of Victoria. Victoria BC, V8W 2Y2 Canada, Email: dgscott@uvic.ca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Children s SpiritualitySame topicReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyFrench-language works237,207