Experience with Thoracoscopic Repair of Long Gap Esophageal Atresia in Neonates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This report evaluates the results of a two-surgeon experience with thoracoscopic repair in patients with long gap esophageal atresia (EA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2000 to February 2015, 14 consecutive patients with pure EA were repaired thoracoscopically. The gap length was then evaluated by contrast gastrostomy tube study. Patients were operated on between 4 to 8 weeks of age. Patient weights ranged from 2.6 to 3.8 kg. The longest gap was 7½ vertebral bodies. Dissection was carried well up into the thoracic inlet on the upper pouch and down to the esophageal hiatus on the lower pouch. A 15th patient was not referred until 3 months of age. RESULTS: All 15 procedures were completed successfully thoracoscopically. Operative times ranged from 60 to 135 minutes. There were two leaks; both resolved with conservative therapy. Feeds were started on Day 5 in all other patients. Six of 13 patients required dilations (one to nine), and 8 required a Nissen fundoplication for severe reflux. All patients are currently on full oral feeds. No patient has any evidence of chest wall asymmetry, winged scapula, or clinically significant scoliosis. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic repair of long gap EA has proven to be an effective and safe technique when performed in the first 2 months of life. The improved visualization and access to the upper pouch and lower pouches allow for maximal mobilization. The results are superior to those of documented open series and avoid the morbidity of repeated operations in the neonatal period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".