Lead isotope constraints on the origin of Cenozoic orogenic gold systems in the Southern Alps and northwestern Otago, South Island, New Zealand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Lead isotopic compositions were determined for sulphides from Pliocene‐Pleistocene gold‐bearing veins in the Alpine Schist and from Miocene gold‐bearing veins and vein breccias from the Shotover‐Macetown area in the northwest Otago Schist belt. The lead isotopic signatures are consistent with derivation of Pb in the vein minerals predominantly from metasedimentary rocks that underlie the region. Differences in Pb isotopic signatures between deposits are interpreted to result from lateral and vertical lithological variability within the source rock mass. The host rocks also contain metabasic rocks with N‐MORB, E‐MORB or within‐plate basalt chemistry. However, the observed Pb isotopic signatures in the gold‐bearing veins preclude incorporation of significant amounts of Pb from the metabasites. The Pb isotopic signatures of lamprophyre dikes that were intruded into the Otago Schist coeval with Miocene gold mineralisation are distinctly more radiogenic than those of the hydrothermal veins. Thus, although the lamprophyre dikes were emplaced into similar extensional structural sites to the gold‐bearing veins, there was no genetic relationship between lamprophyre dikes and gold mineralisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".