Series Clutch Actuators for safe physical human-robot interaction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the design, implementation and control of a device intented to mechanically improve the safety of serial robots interacting with humans. The device consists of an electronically adjustable torque limiter placed in series with each actuator, referred to as a Series Clutch Actuator (SCA). By appropriately adjusting the limit torques according to the robot's configuration, the maximum static force that the robot can apply to its environment at the Tool Centre Point (TCP) can be limited to a prescribed safe level. If a limit torque is exceeded, the SCA slips and an emergency stop is triggered while the inertia located upstream from the SCA in the kinematic chain is mechanically disconnected. A method is presented to determine the optimal limit torques that maximize the isotropically achievable force (which can be applied in all directions without triggering any SCA) while satisfying the safe force limit. An approach to optimize the pose of a redundant robot in order to maximize the isotropically achievable force while preserving a safe maximum force threshold is also proposed. The design and fabrication of a torque limiter using a large number of friction discs is presented. Finally, the mechanisms are implemented into a 4-DOF redundant serial arm and preliminary experimental results are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it