MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124219217 · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.573.13.4

A Polymorphic Locus in the Promoter Region of the <i>IGFBP3</i> Gene Is Related to Mammographic Breast Density

2004· article· en· W2124219217 on OpenAlexaffabout
Joe Lai, Danny Vesprini, William Zhang, Martin J. Yaffe, Michaël Pollak, Steven A. Narod

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCoalition for Research in Women's HealthJewish General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIGFBP3Breast cancerMedicineMammographyOncologyGenotypeFamily historyInternal medicineMAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITYGynecologyRisk factors for breast cancerInsulin-like growth factorEndocrinologyPhysiologyGeneCancerBiologyGrowth factorGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Mammographic breast density is a significant risk factor for breast cancer. Women with dense tissue accounting for more than 60-75% of the area of the breast have a 4- to 6-fold increase in their risk of breast cancer, compared to women with little or no breast density. A high circulating level of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and low IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) level have been associated with increased breast density in premenopausal women. Genetic polymorphisms in the IGF1 and IGFBP3 genes may influence breast and serum levels of these growth factors. The aims of this study were to determine whether polymorphic variations in the IGF1 and IGFBP3 genes are associated with breast density, and serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels, and whether serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels are associated with mammographic density. METHODS: A total of 441 white women, recruited from Women's College Hospital (Toronto, Ontario), enrolled in this study. Each woman completed a questionnaire, detailing information on age, menstrual history, hormone use, diet, and medical and mammography history. Blood samples were taken for DNA extraction to genotype the subjects for polymorphic variants in the two candidate genes, and for measurement of circulating levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3. Mammographic films were retrieved from Women's College Hospital and digitized using a laser film scanner. The digitized images were assessed for breast density using a computer-assisted method. RESULTS: There was a positive association between serum IGFBP-3 levels and the number of A alleles at a previously described polymorphic locus in the promoter region of the IGFBP3 gene among premenopausal women (P = 0.01). There was also a positive trend in the mean percentage of breast density by the number of A alleles of the IGFBP3 gene among premenopausal women (P = 0.0005). Women with two A alleles had a 5-fold increase in the odds of having a percentage of breast density greater or equal to 28%, compared with women with no A allele (P = 0.002). However, there was no association between serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels and breast density among premenopausal women (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to report a strong relationship between a polymorphic gene locus (IGFBP3) and mammographic breast density. However, we could not confirm an association between serum IGF-I levels and breast density among premenopausal women, as demonstrated in previous studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionSame topicDigital Radiography and Breast ImagingFrench-language works237,207