The domain-3a of Munc18-1 plays a crucial role at the priming stage of exocytosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Munc18-1 is believed to prime or stimulate SNARE-mediated membrane fusion/exocytosis through binding to the SNARE complex, in addition to chaperoning its cognate syntaxins. Nevertheless, a Munc18-1 mutant that selectively loses the priming function while retaining the syntaxin chaperoning activity has not been identified. As a consequence, the mechanism that mediates Munc18-1-dependent priming remains unclear. In the course of analyzing the functional outcomes of a variety of point mutations in domain 3a of Munc18-1, we discovered insertion mutants (K332E/K333E with insertions of 5 or 39 residues). These mutants completely lose their ability to rescue secretion whereas they effectively restore syntaxin-1 expression at the plasma membrane as well as dense-core vesicle docking in Munc18-1 and Munc18-2 double-knockdown PC12 cells. The mutants can bind syntaxin-1A in a stoichiometric manner. However, binding to the SNARE complex is impaired compared with the wild type or the hydrophobic pocket mutant (F115E). Our results suggest that the domain 3a of Munc18-1 plays a crucial role in priming of exocytosis, which is independent of its syntaxin-1 chaperoning activity and is downstream of dense-core vesicle docking. We also suggest that the priming mechanism of Munc18-1 involves its domain-3a-dependent interaction with the SNARE complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".