Role of Apoptosis in Low-Dose Hyper-radiosensitivity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Little is known about the mode of cell killing associated with low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity, the radiation response that describes the enhanced sensitivity of cells to small doses of ionizing radiation. Using a technique that measures the activation of caspase 3, we have established a relationship between apoptosis detected 24 h after low-dose radiation exposure and low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity in four mammalian cell lines (T98G, U373, MR4 and 3.7 cells) and two normal human lymphoblastoid cell lines. The existence of low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity in clonogenic survival experiments was found to be associated with an elevated level of apoptosis after low-dose exposures, corroborating earlier observations (Enns et al., Mol. Cancer Res. 2, 557-566, 2004). We also show that enriching populations of MR4 and V79 cells with G(1)-phase cells, to minimize the numbers of G(2)-phase cells, abolished the enhanced low-dose apoptosis. These cell-cycle enrichment experiments strengthen the reported association between low-dose hyper-sensitivity and the radioresponse of G(2)-phase cells. These data are consistent with our current hypothesis to explain low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity, namely that the enhanced sensitivity of cells to low doses of ionizing radiation reflects the failure of ATM-dependent repair processes to fully arrest the progression of damaged G(2)-phase cells harboring unrepaired DNA breaks entering mitosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it