MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124292998 · doi:10.21109/kesmas.v4i4.178

Perencanaan Penanggulangan Keadaan Darurat Transportasi Darat Bahan Kimia Butadien Rute Bojonegara - Cengkareng pada PT X Indonesia

2010· article· id· W2124292998 on OpenAlex
Nelvy Roza, Fatma Lestari

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKesmas National Public Health Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmergency responseEmergency managementPreparednessEngineeringHazardous wasteForensic engineeringTransport engineeringComputer securityMedical emergencyComputer scienceWaste managementMedicineManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PT X Indonesia transports butadiene from its storage terminal in Bojonegara to processing plant in Cengkareng. This research identified potential hazard during butadiene transport, evaluate risk, and evaluate the emergency response preparedness during butadiene transport. Sample is taken from one route from Bojonegara to Cengkareng and data were obtained from observation, interview, records, reports and emergency response preparedness procedure. Qualitative and comparative analysis was conducted between existing emergency response procedures at PT X Indonesia with Manitoba Industrial Accidents Council Standards and Advisory Committee on the Transport of Dangerous Goods - Australia. Elements analysed including company policy, risk analysis, organization, facilities and equipment, emergency response steps, training and emergency drill. Results suggested that company’s policy has been set up for emergency response procedure and has been reviewed, revised, and distributed to all related parties. Risk analysis conducted using hazard identification method by reviewing Material Safety Data Saheet and Transport Emergency Card to determine butadiene toxicity, carcinogenicity, and flammability. Consequences analysis was conducted based on worst case scenario of Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosion. Emergency Response Preparedness organization was established. Accident prevention was also implemented such as tank inspection, driver’s qualification, and tank condition inspection. Emergency response equipment and facilities included fire extinguishers, safety shoes, helm, and gloves that included emergency steps, knowledge to the driver regarding emergency response. Emergency drill element should be improved, as existing drill not specific for butadiene transport emergency response. Key words : Transport emergency response, butadiene transport, hazardous materials transport

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it